
The
Library of Dust, by David Maisel, documents a collection of human ashes stored in an American hospital:
Inside a dusty room in a decaying outbuilding on the grounds of a state-run psychiatric hospital are simple pine shelves lined three-deep with thousands of copper canisters. The canisters hold the cremated remains of mental patients who died at the hospital from 1883 (the year the hospital was opened, when it was known as the Oregon State Insane Asylum) to the 1970’s, and whose bodies remained unclaimed by their families.
The beautiful verdigris patterns that distinguish the canisters in Maisel's photos are caused by age and oxidation, no doubt enhanced by the release of salts and acids from the once human contents.
A few of my favourite gothic cliches converge in this project: mental patients, abandoned sheds, lonely deaths, institutionalised neglect... but I'd like to consider the collection as a collection.

It is by definition a collection of the uncollected. The bodies not claimed by loved ones or other responsible adults to be returned to earth were cooked and canned and shelved in the shed.
Maisel's documentation suggests that they were catalogued:
Numbers are stamped into each lid; the lowest number is 01, and the highest is 5,118.
Are they held 'pending collection', on the off chance that someone might turn up one day with a writ of
habeas corpus? Was there an intended date of disposal / dispersal? Or was it someone's best effort at the orderly preservation of identity for perpetuity?

I have combed through the sheds of dead collectors: classifying, evaluating, discarding and preserving the stuff they had stored because 'it might come in handy one day'. I'm cautiously watchful of the point where my own tendency to collect the potentially useful might tip into compulsive hoarding of the kind that, as a government gardener, I have, in the past, had to remove from public housing tenancies: the kind that provides outraged voyeur's fodder for
Today Tonight: rooms filled floor to ceiling with bundled newspapers, shoeboxes filled with human excrement, dehydrated and dated.

When I sorted through my father's shed after his death, I removed items that, appearance-wise, were not dissimilar to Maisel's canisters. Leaking oil-filled transformers, unmarked containers of corrosive god-knows-what, verdigrised copper tanks and windings, pre-war Ovaltine tins etched with rusty tide-lines and sludgy growth rings. I threw so much out; I saved so much. My inheritance fills my own shed: the drum full of half-inch washers, the bakelite voltage meters, the plastic handles and ex-PMG exchange counters.
You can't keep everything, counselled my brother, and I haven't.

When I was in the bush I composted a journal recording 15 years worth of dreams - my own and those reported by loved ones who trusted my custodianship of such intimate information. Without ceremony or sentiment, I burned significant photographs that can never be reproduced because they contained images of people who are dead or otherwise unavailable to me. When I disposed of a redundant computer I temporarily agonised over archiving three years of an email exchange that documented one of the most significant relationships in my life - then arbitrarily wiped it.
Non, je ne regrette rien, the decision rests easily; though from time to time I wonder about the ease of those relinquishments and what it might mean for the mementos that are retained and carried from place to place, but are too excruciating to look at.
I guess they attain a kind of beauty when, transformed, they too begin to leak from their canisters.